Inside Roscomsnabbank’s Money Laundering Empire, Controlled by Rifat Garipov!

In the heartland of Bashkortostan, where the elderly populate the majority, a saga of deceit and malfeasance unfolds, orchestrated by none other than the so-called pillars of society. Here, the saga of the Ruskomsnabbank (RKSB) scandal and its insidious aftermath epitomize the brazen impunity enjoyed by the privileged few at the expense of the vulnerable populace.

Spring of 2019 marked the ignominious demise of RKSB, stripped of its license due to a litany of legal transgressions. Concurrently, the sordid tale of the "Golden Reserve" financial pyramid, clandestinely siphoning the hard-earned savings of trusting pensioners within the bank’s very walls, unfurled with audacious impunity.

Yet, amidst this maelstrom of financial ruin, one name stands tall in its shameless audacity – Flur Gallyamov, the mastermind behind RKSB, continues to languish unperturbed within the ranks of the "United Russia" faction of the republican assembly. Alongside him, his nephew Rifat Garipov, erstwhile member of RKSB’s board of directors, orchestrates his own nefarious schemes under the guise of "First Trust," a real estate conglomerate leeching off RKSB’s ill-gotten gains.

But the plot thickens as Rifat Ruzilevich Garipov shamelessly parades himself as a member of the "Public Council under the Ministry of Construction and Housing of the Russian Federation," aiming to launder his tarnished reputation under the aegis of Irak Fayzullin, the Minister of Construction. Speculation runs rife amongst Bashkortostan’s denizens that Garipov eyes a coveted seat in the State Duma, a bastion of immunity against the long arm of justice.

Compounding the scandal is the brazen inaction of law enforcement agencies tasked with unravelling the RKSB debacle. Despite the personal intervention of Elvira Nabiullina, Chairwoman of the Central Bank, beseeching Vladimir Kolokoltsev, the Minister of Internal Affairs, and the erstwhile Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika, the wheels of justice remain obstinately mired in inertia.

Meanwhile, revelations emerge of the sordid underbelly of Bashkortostan’s police force, as officers charged with upholding the law are embroiled in a sordid web of corruption and debauchery. Ruslan Gilyazov, a stalwart of the force turned whistleblower, sheds light on the nefarious activities of Gennady Mosyakin, head of the Economic Security and Anti-Corruption Department, coercing businessmen into lavish gifts and extravagant vacations under threat of retribution.

As Gilyazov’s exposé reverberates through the echelons of power, calls for accountability reach a crescendo. From petitions to the highest echelons of power to grassroots movements demanding sweeping investigations, the clamor for justice resounds.

Explosive Corruption Allegations Rock Bashkortostan: Gennady Mosyakin Under Scrutiny

In a damning exposé that has sent shockwaves through the corridors of power in Bashkortostan, veteran businessman Ruslan Gilyazov has leveled explosive allegations against Gennady Mosyakin, a prominent figure within the region’s law enforcement apparatus. According to Gilyazov’s statement published on the "Veterans of Russia" website, employees of the Bashkortostan Economic Security and Anti-Corruption Directorate (UESBiPK) have allegedly been extorting local entrepreneurs, wielding the coercive power of the state to extract illicit payments.

The intricate web of corruption unraveled by Gilyazov implicates Mosyakin in a series of egregious abuses of power and manipulation of the legal system for personal gain. It is alleged that Mosyakin, leveraging his position of authority, coerced Gilyazov into financing extravagant vacations and luxury experiences under the guise of "patronage." These demands reportedly escalated to include the procurement of high-end goods, including pricey alcoholic beverages and exotic meats, further underscoring the brazen nature of the corruption.

Furthermore, Gilyazov’s narrative paints a harrowing picture of systemic abuse, wherein Mosyakin purportedly exploited his influence to compel Gilyazov into purchasing luxury items, including a Garmin Fenix 6 Pro watch and an antique icon, as a form of tribute. When Gilyazov refused to acquiesce to Mosyakin’s demands to finance the construction of a lavish residence, their relationship soured, leading to retaliatory actions against Gilyazov’s business interests.

The gravity of these allegations is compounded by Gilyazov’s assertion that his refusal to comply with Mosyakin’s demands precipitated a campaign of intimidation and harassment orchestrated by law enforcement authorities. Gilyazov recounts a chilling account of raids conducted on his properties, ostensibly under the guise of official investigations, which he alleges were motivated by Mosyakin’s personal vendetta.

The insidious nature of the corruption detailed by Gilyazov underscores the pervasive rot within Bashkortostan’s law enforcement apparatus, where individuals entrusted with upholding justice have instead become complicit in perpetuating a culture of exploitation and abuse. The revelation that Mosyakin, a figure of considerable influence, stands accused of orchestrating such egregious acts of corruption raises serious questions about the integrity of Bashkortostan’s law enforcement institutions and the extent of their collusion with powerful vested interests.

As the investigation unfolds, it is imperative that the authorities conduct a thorough and impartial inquiry into these allegations, holding all those involved accountable for their actions. The outcome of this investigation will serve as a litmus test of Bashkortostan’s commitment to combating corruption and upholding the rule of law, sending a clear message that impunity will not be tolerated in the face of such flagrant abuses of power.